| “THE CURE”
BREAKTHROUGH
OR BEAT-UP?
Has anyone else noted the recent
influx of “A Cure for Diabetes” stories around at the moment? I know
you have because you’ve been bashing my door down trying to get a Reality
Check on it all. Here it is:
First a wee bit of background:
Type 1 Diabetes is caused by our
immune systems destroying the cells which produce insulin in our pancreases.
A lot of research happening at the moment is focusing on transplanting
new insulin-producing cells into our bodies and ensuring that our immune
system does not or cannot destroy them again.
More: http://www.diabetes.org/diabetesforecast/00March/page54.asp
The most recent story on the news
was from Edmonton,
Canada. Insulin-producing islet cells were taken from young healthy
people who had died, and injected into the hepatic vein near the liver.
Seven people with Type 1 Diabetes underwent this procedure and have now
been “insulin INdependent” for more than a year. There are a few
catches though, as always!
Here’s a checklist of a few things
to look out for to see whether the cure stories we hear are just media
beat ups or real breakthroughs.
Immune suppressants.
All current transplants involve
patients taking immune suppressants for the rest of their lives. This means
your immune system is significantly suppressed so that a simple cold could
kill you.
There are also
increased risks of cancer. The only people who qualify for transplants
on an ethical basis are those whose diabetes is considered more life-threatening
than immune suppression would be. Mainly these people are suffering
severely and repeatedly from hypoglycaemia unawareness ie. no early symptoms
of hypos just blacking out straight away. This is very rare. (Thank
goodness!).
A real
breakthrough would involve no immune suppression. Instead,
attempts are being made to prevent rejection of insulin-producing cells
by encapsulating them in membranes which have pores of a size sufficient
to allow nutrients in and insulin out, but too small to allow entry of
antibodies or cells of the immune system to destroy the cells.
Are the insulin-producing cells
readily available?
The number of pancreases required
per person for the Edmonton study was 2-3. Only 156 people in Australia
donated organs last year.
The insulin-producing
cells also have to be separated from the pancreas. The cost of setting
up a facility to do this is considerable (a million to establish and half
a million a year to maintain). It is for this reason that there is no such
facility in Australia. At the very best, the Edmonton procedure could
only benefit 40 of the 100,000 Australians with insulin-dependant diabetes
each year.
For this reason,
scientists are currently pursuing transplanting insulin-producing cells
from animals into humans and also engineering other cells from our bodies
to produce, store and secrete insulin.
Simple technology
A “cure” needs to be not so labour
intensive that only a few clinics could perform it. Similarly, it
needs to be relatively affordable. The Edmonton trial cost approximately
US$100,000 per patient. (Even if you’d pay that, plenty couldn’t!)
Does the technique work in humans?
If so, are people able to cease
insulin injections? For how long? How many people have remained off insulin
for 1 year?
Beware that some
stories reported in the media refer only to trials on mice or the like.
It’s worth asking the above questions before taking much notice.
Many
thanks to Margo Honeyman, Bernie Tuch, Karen Hirth, Alison Nankervis and
Steve Santen for their assistance with this article.
|